Search results for: "A" (4258 results)
implement the literal provisions of RFRA; they ask whether granting a RFRA accommodation will in any particular case prevent a generally applicable
note 48, at 594. 119. The Court framed anonymity as a question related to “[e]ffective advocacy” and association rather than its own independent
be a rebuttable presumption and the two-year compensation amount merely a default award, adjustable to actual damage upon proof. Admittedly, it is
Amendment applied to the arrest of a Mexican citizen in Mexico. As noted above, Chief Justice Rehnquist appeared to adopt the compact theory of the
§ 103(a) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2703(h)(3) (2018)). × See Assistance and Access Bill 2018: Explanatory Document, Austl. Dep’t Home Aff. 7 (Aug. 2017
attack. Pan American World Airways v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.is the leading case interpreting the exclusion of “warlike action.” In that case, a
self-interested.98 AI law de- ploys a similar tool in the algorithmic-impact assessment, also called an AI- impact assessment.99 Impact assessments are
an officeholder in her thrall? A subsection targets anyone who corruptly gives, offers, or agrees to give anything of value to any person, with intent
not seem justified by a consumer welfare standard alone. As another commentator later described it, rather than supporting competition above all
children’s options? I answer with a list of four or five elementary schools that I assure him are as good as any private school in the city. All of them are