Search

Search results for: "120" (1934 results)

1088

%. 119. Technically, we are measuring from HLAB interview to either ALJ decision or a withdrawal of the appeal by the party who brought it. 120

Forum: How (Not) To Bring an Affirmative-Action Challenge

for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Rasmussen, 298 F.3d 1198, 1202 n.2 (10th Cir. 2002) (citing F.E.R. v. Valdez, 58 F.3d 1530, 1533 (10th Cir. 1995

Microsoft Word - 9.Vladeck.D3_Ready_for_HTML_v2.doc

Ct. 1204). 3. See id. at 1-2 (majority opinion); see also Indep. Living Ctr. of S. Cal., Inc. v. Shewry, 543 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2008) (holding that

Seeking Equity in Electronic Monitoring: Mounting a i Bearden /i Challenge | Yale Law Journal

the collection of court-imposed costs under California Penal Code section 1203.016, which pertains to EM); see also California AB 1869 Criminal Fees

Forum: Civil Rights Strategies To Increase Mobility

was no market, to more affordable single-family housing with prices ranging from $120,000 to $175,000. This housing would primarily have housed

Pratt

Age of Hypergentrification, 85 FORDHAM L. REV. 1189, 1204 (2016) (“Downzoning has become the urban equivalent of exclusionary zoning in suburbs

The New Labor Law

kinds of concerted activity in which workers can engage. See supra notes 120-125 and accompanying text. See Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310

i Brown /i , Not i Loving /i : i Obergefell /i and the Unfinished Business of Formal Equality | Yale Law Journal

Ohio Feb. 23, 2015), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:14-CV-759, 2015 WL 1201275 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 16, 2015), at 3 (S.D. Ohio 2015) (same); Revely

Ordering Conduct Yet Evading Review: A Simple Step Toward Preserving Federal Supremacy | Yale Law Journal

injunctions between 1890 and 1934). See Erwin Chemerinsky, Against Sovereign Immunity, 53 Stan. L. Rev. 1201, 1202 (2001) (arguing tha… See Erwin

Forum: I Say Dissental, You Say Concurral

case=12001447725585097141 (granting certiorari to consider the proper scope of 18 U.S.C. § 1346); Weyhrauch v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 2863 (2009