Search results for: "The" (4774 results)
they obscure defects in the law. And when judges obscure defects in the law, they stymie democratic change. By testing family-law theory against family
their lofty promises, leaving significant ques- tions about the future of global health law going forward.3 In response to these challenges
uncommon for lawyers who do not share the same race as their criminal defendant clients. And, of course, there is no easy answer to these internal
claiming only the specific structural features of antibodies they both possessed and described, but also entitle them to assert their patents against
laws purport to protect, the laws themselves can and should be modified or repealed. Of course, there are various objections, some of them quite
“interrogation” sufficient to trigger the protection of Miranda was limited to questions or their functional equivalent, and then held that the functional
challenges of the political process. If they cannot make credible representations to their constituents and provide them with valued services, they will not
Courts create decision heuristics to enable them to quickly dispose of complex cases. They then write decisions employing the heuristics and publish
and with clauses naming the book being reviewed; there should never be a supra that leads to a source in these parentheticals. S.R. 4.2: Hereinafter
know what the statute means when the judges and prosecutors themselves do not know, or must make it up as they go along?”61 The public would not