Search results for: "17" (2417 results)
www.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/opinion/17mazzone.html. It is actually very easy to think of other limits on federal power. There is the one rejected in McCulloch v
economy definitions include large numbers from this group.17 For tax and regulatory purposes, workers conven- tionally associated with the “gig economy
in International Human Rights Law, U.N. Doc. HR/PUB/12/06 (2012); Human Rights Council Res. 17/19, Rep. of the Human Rights Council, 17th Sess., June
February 17, 2023 906 be made by individuals most familiar with the tribal nation.9 Despite the lack of focus on tribal courts in environmental law
Tennessee Prosecutorial Region 2000-2010, 17 AIDS & BEHAV. 2624, 2624 (2013). 5. See, e.g., Campbell v. State, No. 05-08-00736-CR, 2009 WL 2025344
polarized voting as inconsistent with the Fifteenth Amendment’s historical context); Crum, Superfluous, supra note 5, at 1602-17 (discussing the Fortieth
% 106th (1999-2000) Republican 17 53.6 / 43.9 140M / 139M 50.1% / 49.9% 107th (2001-2002) Mixed 9 54.4 / 41.4 175M / 111M 61.1% / 38.9% 108th
Peoples, 25 AMICUS CURIAE 7, 7 (2000). 45. See Rolnick, The Promise of Mancari, supra note 17, at 959 n. 1714, 959 n.2, 963-64, 1000-01. 46. See id
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 345 (1991)). 10. 17 U.S.C. § 102 (2012). 11. Id. the yale law journal forum October 14
at 17 (contrasting custom and treaties as sources… See 1 Vattel, The Law of Nations, supra note 10, at 17 (contrasting custom and treaties as sources