Search results for: "The" (4773 results)
observed it was likely that about “25,000 inmates in the United States” were living in such conditions, “many regardless of their conduct in prison
courts do not enforce these agreements. Instead, they find them void for public policy or in direct contravention of the jurisdiction’s laws regulating
free will? Even if motives are causes, it does not follow that the law scrutinizes them for their causal impact. For example, the law may care about
with these people. They’re millionaires, they have the money, so they can do what they want, and there’s no competition. According to an estimate by
week outside their cells. And on weekends, they are seldom released at all. The Report also shows us that prisoners confined to the box have limited
process here. How will a U.S. court assert jurisdiction over the rest, and then enforce judgments against them? 2. Reasonableness of Conduct
these kinds of equal-opportunity programs were not new, their widespread implementation triggered a backlash that had been simmering for years. The
International—but he has only begun. i i . the originalist turn These opinions are remarkable for four reasons: they are originalist in a doctrinal
that they advance.53 Judges can also use their discretion to apply the same rules to pro se litigants, taking into account that these litigants can’t
they are homeless. Yet, the moment these same individuals reach their maximum prison release dates, if they are not subject to a term of PRS, DOCCS