Search results for: "antitrust" (463 results)
these worries suggest a missed opportunity in Posner’s opinion. Near the start, Posner analogizes Title VII to the Sherman Antitrust Act, which has long
antitrust.251 In 1972, the Supreme Court situated the right of access to the courts in the Petition Clause in both the antitrust context, in California
509 U.S. 764, 796 (1993) (applying U.S. antitrust law when activity in England has a “ substantial effect in the United States” ); Case 89/85
Antitrust Violations, 48 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 335, 338-44 (2011) (describing how courts have illuminated this standard). 104. E.g., 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a
& Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 175, 177-85 (1997). Robert P. Inman & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Making Sense of the Antitrust State-Action Doctrine
subsequently applied to myriad legal fields, ranging from environmental law136 to banking137 to antitrust.138 At least to some extent, the Tiebout
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 17). 56. IRVING BERNSTEIN, THE NEW DEAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING POLICY 27
the overlapping antitrust authority of the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice can be justified on these grounds. Similarly
toward questions of corporate behavior and antitrust. Conclusion Although long past, the patent crisis of the nineteenth century still seems to hang in
setting BNP Paribas case, included the cases of: Deutsche Bank, which paid $625 million in an antitrust case; Commerzbank, which paid $641 million