Search results for: "antitrust" (463 results)
covid-misinformation- first-amendment-psaki-murthy-section-230-antitrust-11660732095 [https://perma.cc/VT7C-BZMF]. 43. See, e.g., Letter from Mark
rights liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; states are not. Further, states enjoy broader antitrust immunity than their political subdivisions. It is also
Another potentially relevant reporting requirement, the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, requires, assum- ing the jurisdictional
dismissing an antitrust class action for failure to state a “plausible” claim); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (applying Twombly’s
USE POLICIES 45-49 (2001). 97. See, e.g., KEITH N. HYLTON, ANTITRUST LAW: ECONOMIC THEORY AND COMMON LAW EVOLUTION 13 (2003) (describing the
00201 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2015) (pleading guilty to violations of antitrust laws for an agreement among the defendant and his coconspirators to fix
Presidential Control Versus Bureaucratic Power: Explaining the Reagan Revolution in Antitrust, 34 AM. J. POL. SCI. 269 (1990); Wood & Waterman, supra note
indeed, little) judicial attention. In the words of the authors, “a litigant in an ‘important’ antitrust or securities case, one who is represented by
Sense of the Antitrust State-Action Doctrine: Balancing Political Participation and Economic Efficiency in Regulatory Federalism, 75 TEX. L. REV
economic opportunity and social mobility.” Under the common law and antitrust statutes, “freedom of contract” ended where “restraint of trade” began.15