Katyal

at 2416-17. 14. Part II of this Essay discusses other evidence that emerged after oral argument. This Part dis- cusses only statements that were

Congressional Intervention in Agency Adjudication: The Case of Veterans’ Appeals

consideration of evidence collected on an open agency record—and it backed that requirement with judicial review. The APA’s requirement that agencies act

Equal Standards for Equal Protection: Revisiting Race Discrimination in Jury Selection After i SFFA /i | Yale Law Journal

sentences after evidence emerged that the office had intentionally excluded Black and Jewish prospective jurors from sitting on juries in capital cases

significant because the Supreme Court typically views Founding-Era congressional enactments as highly probative evidence of the Constitution’s original

Forum: Is Korematsu Good Law?

incriminating evidence in their cars is engaged in bad policing because he is ignoring or sidelining more reliable indicators of criminality than race

Forum: Scalia and the King: The Ancient Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Missing Legitimacy Core of Modern Habeas Law

assistance at both the trial and postconviction levels by holding evidentiary hearings to gather new evidence that did not exist in the state record

raise claims of ineffective assistance at both the trial and postconviction levels by holding evidentiary hear- ings to gather new evidence that did

Shepard

This evidence suggests that, especially in small courtrooms, where one sits matters as much as what one wears. For the same reasons that we permit

Injured on the Job: Standing, Federalism, and State Wage-and-Hour Laws

that in a class action, every individual class member must furnish evidence that they specifically suffered a concrete injury. Combined, these

985a

ignoring the fact that Wisconsin has adopted a particular version of the parol evidence rule. And yet we routinely see analogous principles—for example