Search results for: "The" (6917 results)
punishes counsel for handling these cases correctly and rewards them only if they take every case to trial without adequate preparation or the
analyzes their practical conse- quences and the theoretical challenges they could pose to the doctrinal puzzle described in this Article. The purpose of
the case,54 and requiring corrective notices at defendants’ expense when there has been an inappropriate communication.55 These opinions usually do
evaluate the sensibility of these interests and measure the extent to which qualified immunity advances them. Until then, we are left with the
and the judiciary. From the outside, these may seem to be all of a piece, but for insiders, there are sharp differences among them. Consider, for
could, at least in theory, constitutionalize their enactments through the very fact of enacting them. Even if courts were to use other indicia of
computer and therefore retain all repetitive digits. Consequently, we do not follow The Bluebook in these instances. For example: See Planned
interbranch dialogue to take place: courts lack the same guides to reading these bills that they have when the drafting offices use their own manuals
persons and, in the event of death, in exhuming and identifying them and returning their remains. See Comm. on Enforced Disappearances, supra note 1, art
direct funding for their own children’s education to the school of their choice. In theory, families will then have an incentive to shift their