Search results for: "40" (2373 results)
introduced in the United States in the mid-1880s, in the 38. Abraham & Schwarcz, supra note 21, at 651. 39. See id. at 40 (discussing the standard-form
Relationships to Quasi-Markets: An Odyssey Along the Policy Paths of Altruism and Egoism, 40 SOC. POL’Y & ADMIN. 10 (2006). 27. See BENKLER, supra note 3, at
Alison L. LaCroix, The Interbellum Constitution: Federalism in the Long Founding Moment, 67 Stan. L. Rev. 397, 409-40 (2015) (recounting debates
17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2020). 2. In re Cady, Roberts & Co., 40 S.E.C. 907, 911 (Nov. 8, 1961). 3. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) § 32
in general equilibrium than by the comparative-institutional orientation of Demsetz’s original article.40 There are existing critiques of the
101 MINN. L. REV. 3225, 3239-40 (2024) [hereinafter Racial Justice Complexities] (“Zackey Rahimi was the quin- tessential bad guy who very few
Transcript of Motions Hearing, supra note 30, at 40 (“When you have a sale under 363 in a Chapter 11 the best evidence of value is the audit and sale
as “respect for ‘the constitu- tional role of the States as sovereign entities.’’40 Finally, in NFIB v. Sebelius, Chief Justice Roberts declared
Complexities, 101 MINN. L. REV. 3225, 3239-40 (2024) [hereinafter Racial Justice Complexities] (“Zackey Rahimi was the quin- tessential bad guy who very
disadvantage. Id. 39. Id. at 337-40. the yale law journal 123:2878 2014 2888 in the doctrinal structures that currently guide antidiscrimination law