Search results for: "2" (2803 results)
1 All times are ET unless otherwise noted. 2 ● Justified: The Note’s argument should be analytically sound. Each step in the argument
%20DHS%20brief%20on%20PSG.pdf. 2 See Matter of C-A-, 3 I. & N. Dec. 951 (BIA 2006) (particular social group must be “visible”) and Matter of S-E- G-, 24
Cell A requires the 172. Cf. Levmore, supra note 72, at 2154 & n.14 (observing that C&M’s Rule 2 can be partitioned into Rule 2N, in which
Rico Nutrition Assistance Fairness Act, H.R. 253, 118th Cong. § 2 (2023). 197 See, e.g., Supplemental Security Income Equality Act, H.R. 256, 118th
5. 77 CAL. L. REV. 235 (1989). POLLAK V122021 (POST OP POST FORMATTING FIXES, POST FLIP) 2/6/2006 5:55:40 PM the yale law journal 115:745 2006
§ 16750(a) (West 2008); D.C. Code § 28-4509(a) (2011); 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 10/7(2) (West 2010); Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.778 (2009); Minn. Stat. § 325D
Id. 75. 2 U.S.C. § 285b(1) (2018). 76. See infra Section II.C. the yale law journal 134:2122 2025 2138 Second, the process by which codified text is
Consumers Chapter 13 Businesses <$50m Businesses >$50m 0 50 100 150 200 250 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 N um be r o f C as es a s % o f 2 00 8 Q
493.1253(b)(2) (establishment of performance specifications).”). × See 42 U.S.C. § 263a(f)(3) (2018) (describing CLIA’s proficiency testing program
256. See NASH, supra note 203, at 139. 257. 2 HUTCHINSON, supra note 154, at 289. 258. Id. PRIESTFINAL.DOC MAY 3, 2001 5/3/01 4:24 PM 2001] Colonial