Search results for: "n" (3655 results)
U.S. at 613. 79. Isserles, supra note 74, at 361; see also New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 767 & n.20 (1982) (“The traditional rule is that a person
; United States v. Diggs, 613 F.2d 988, 998 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 982 (1980); see also O’Con- nor, supra note 24, 853 n.22 (1988
the motion picture); Weinreb, supra note 166, at 1144 & n.34 (discussing how the film was “transformative” yet not a fair use according to accepted
will not even begin, and the NDA is sent back to the manufacturer. 1 O’REILLY, supra note 46, § 13.11, at 13-67 n.379 (citing Letter from Roger L
of firearms). 71. United States v. Oppedisano, No. 09-CR-0305, 2010 WL 4961663, at *2 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2010). 72. Id. 73. Id. at *2. 74. Id
at 460 n.13; see also In re Dumont, 581 F.3d at 1111 (noting that, in interpreting BAPCPA, “legislative history is not an able guide”). 44. See
DOT/N HTSA/NCSA/Content/TSF/2007/810993.pdf (last visited May 4, 2009). 1494.MURRAY.1555-NEW.DOC 5/27/2009 6:04:17 PM the yale law journal 118:1484
nature of intention. To see the need for it, notice that both the “wide” and the “narrow” senses of trying take intention to be crucial to trying. Part
Denner, No. CV 2020-1061-JTL, 2022 WL 1671006, at *52 (Del. Ch. May 26, 2022) (“[A]n officer does not have a duty to comply with directives that
the Supreme Court, he did not press any claim to notice by indictment. Apprendi, 120 S. Ct. at 2355 n.3. Nonetheless, the Court’s reasoning and its