Search results for: "2000" (1874 results)
theory.10 It also is the first close study 7. See, e.g., Adrian Vermeule, Interpretive Choice, 75 N.Y.U. L. REV. 74 (2000); sources cited supra
regulated parties. See, e.g., H.R. Rep. No. 106-1009, at 1 (2000) (noting that guidance documents can allow agencies … See, e.g., H.R. Rep. No. 106
; Sinkfield v. Kelley, 531 U.S. 28 (2000) (per curiam); and Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001). 7. John Hart Ely, Confounded by Cromartie: Are Racial
based system. See Managed Medicaid: Arizona’s AHCCCS Experience, Nat’l Health Pol’y F. 1 (2000), https://www.nhpf.org/library/site-visits/SV AZ00
Antigay Discourse and the Channeling Effect of Judicial Review, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1327, 1351-52 (2000). After its passage, similar arguments were
Resources and Resourcefulness: Strategic Capacity in the Unionization of California Agriculture, 1959-1966, 105 Am. J. Soc. 1003, 1019 (2000). That said
Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction (2021); Kunal M. Parker, Making Foreigners: Immigration and Citizenship Law in America, 1600-2000 (2015
the Practice of Law, 18 Alternatives 107, 123 (2000). Michele Cotton, Improving Access to Justice by Enforcing the Free Speech Clause, 83 Brook. L
also reflected in state antibullying laws and school district policies. In 2000, only three states had anti-bullying statutes, and only one explicitly
obtain a public education for their children . . . .”). 57. See Carson, 142 S. Ct. at 1999-2000. 58. Id. at 2001. 59. Id. the yale law journal forum